Jamilah Snells vs Anjali Kotecha Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Jul at 10:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Snells vs A. Kotecha

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Snells 1 - 0 Kotecha
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jamilah Snells winning 2 and Anjali Kotecha winning 0. The last match between Jamilah Snells and Anjali Kotecha was at the W50 Nottingham, 14-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Jamilah Snells getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Snells | 1 |
| Kotecha | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W50 Nottingham(07-14-25)
J. Snells vs A. Kotecha H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 47.41% (64-71) | Career Total W/L | 23.53% (4-13) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Snells vs A. Kotecha Match Preview:
- Kotecha's second serve success rate in the last 6 months stands at a mere 9.09%, whereas Snells has maintained a much stronger 40.18%. How could this impact the match outcome? Typically, a higher second serve success rate favors winning consistency.
- When it comes to return game performance, Kotecha has won 42.86% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Snells has achieved 52.28%. This difference could be critical for momentum.
- Looking at first serve returns, Kotecha trails significantly at 5.26%, compared to Snells’ 35.04%. Is Snells’ capability to capitalize on first returns an advantage? Certainly, as it often influences service breaks.
- Under pressure situations, Snells saves 47.59% of breakpoints, far outperforming Kotecha’s 14.29%, indicating stronger mental fortitude during crucial points.
- Analyzing overall performance in the past year, Kotecha holds a 57.14% match win rate, while Snells has a slightly lower 50.94%. Does Kotecha's slightly better win rate suggest a potential edge?
- On surface preferences, Kotecha excels on indoor hard courts with a 33% win rate but struggles on hard courts at 27%. In contrast, Snells thrives on clay with a 56% win rate, showing versatility and adaptability on different surfaces.
- Regarding event level competition, Kotecha has competed mostly in Futures/ITF $10K tournaments with a 50% win percentage, unlike Snells who boasts a better 56.67% win rate in similar levels. Could their gameplay exposure provide Snells an upper hand?
- Opponent quality suggests Kotecha faced tougher players averaging a rank of 192, whereas Snells' competition averaged rank is 284.77. Does this mean Snells has competitive experience with a wider range of players?
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Kotecha has a strong winning percentage of 67% in deciding sets, exceeding Snells' 53% rate.
- Examining breakpoint conversion, Kotecha falls short with 0% conversion, while Snells excels at 39.2%, potentially offering a critical advantage in clutch moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):
Statistical analysis reveals significant advantages in Snells’ recent form, notably their superior second serve performance, return game efficiency, and mental resilience under pressure.
Kotecha shows strength in overall match wins and performance in deciding sets, promising excitement if the match reaches a third set. However, compared to Snells, Kotecha struggles with surface versatility and stats essential to capturing and converting breakpoints.
Considering Snells’ capacity to convert crucial points and maintain robust second serve stats, the likelihood leans towards Snells securing a victory in the upcoming match.
Jamilah Snells vs Anjali Kotecha Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Snells vs A. Kotecha H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:17:36 | Average Match Time | 1:17:36 |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve % | 74% (53/72) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 79% (11/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (38/72) | Return Points Win % | 23% (10/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Snells Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-0 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(1) | ||
A. Kotecha Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||

J. Snells vs A. Kotecha Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.41% (64/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 23.53% (4/13) |
| 47.46% (140/155) | Sets Win/Loss | 24.32% (9/28) |
| 50.04% (1304/1302) | Games Win/Loss | 40.52% (139/204) |
| 40.00% (22/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 21.43% (3/11) |
| 54.67% (41/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 62 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 227 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 352.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 214.88 |
| 65% (2666/4074) | 1st Serve % | 69% (368/530) |
| 55% (1468/2666) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (184/368) |
| 40% (558/1408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (60/162) |
| 43% (227/527) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (26/48) |
| 44% (1861/4193) | Return Points Win % | 42% (195/462) |
| 43.75% (28/36) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 50.70% (36/35) | Futures W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 48% (64/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 24% (4/17) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (6/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 58% (15/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 87% (63/55) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 13% (63/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 13% (72/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (13/1) |